Monday, May 15, 2006

A Litte Monday Dilemma


Ok, today was an interesting day at work. Being the outsider that I am, I have slowly yet surely built a role for myself in the work place and adhere to it pretty strictly, and rarely go outside of the boundaries. Primarily, I am an Assistant Language Teacher, which means I assist a Japanese teacher in the teaching of the English Language, which in turns means that there are two of us in the room and I serve in a purely secondary, assistance role, which the name implies. As to other functions which the Japanese teachers have (and believe you me, they are many, much more than their counter-parts in the U.S.), none of them apply to me, nor are they expected of me. I may occasionally choose to voluntarily accept some but usually, like I said, I stick to the role of ALT, as well as the resident gorilla. But today, two things happened which placed me in an unfamiliar situation and, on the spot, I had to make some decisions, which, in hindsight, I am trying to figure out.

The first. I am walking out of my first period first grade class (junior high school 7th grade equivalent) and look to the right, down the hall, where some commotion is taking place outside the classroom of the other section of first grade. (They're split into 1-1 and 1-2, much like old school Soviet style, with 1B, etc.) A bunch of kids, boys and girls, are gathered around two students, one of whom is on the floor and the other towering above him, giving him slight kicks to the legs. I see another teacher, a music teacher, in the vicinity, and this gives me reassurance that whatever is happening is meant to. Keep in mind, in Japanese schools, the notion of light violence between students is quite common. Age is very important, and anyone who is older is automatically entitled to get away with a lot, and so seeing students slap or punch each other (not on the face, but still in what appear to be painful ways) is common place. I used to be shocked by it, but no longer. So, I attribute what is happening to the above and, being reassured by the presence of the teacher, think no further of it. However, as I start walking away, I hear that the kid on the floor is crying, rather loudly. I look back, the other teacher is gone, and the action has now moved inside the classroom. I go to investigate and see that the kid is now on the ground against the wall, being repeatedly kicked and slapped by the bigger one, and all the other kids are standing around, laughing, yelling stuff incomprehensible to me. At this point, I'm going on instict, ignoring whatever I may have learnt about Japanese customs and school life, I make my way over to the kid and make myself a protective cordon sanitaire, keeping everyone away from him. The bully manages to sneak by and land a few more awkward throws before I literally remove him from the scene. After this, I take the shaken, crying boy and we walk away from the scene, toward the teachers room. I try to ask him what happened but he is too shocked and shy to tell me anything. We're standing outside the teachers' room and I'm trying to figure out what to do and finally decide to go tell one of my English teachers, kind of passing on the baton, after a brief explanation of my understanding as to what happened. He took over, talked to the kid, talked to some other teachers and it passed out of my hands and the day could go on.

But immediately, I began having qualms. To start with, what kind of chain reaction, if any, had I set in motion? Would the other teachers take up an investigation, try to figure out what happened, dispense some sort of punishment upon the perpetrator? Even though it was unlikely to go this far, it was still a possibility, and then I wondered about the future consequences of this for the kid. Where as without my interference, he would have recovered from the incident and life could proceed, with my interference, was there a chance that it would ensure future troubles for this kid and further retribution for him being a teachers' boy, seeking outside assistance where none was needed? It wasn't a very simple situation, especially considering the group dynamics of school interaction. This student was obviously signaled out and excluded from the social circle (whether briefly or not is not known) and this enabled the kind of treatment that befell him in front of all the other students. It may very well be a natural occurrence between school kids of this age (12, 13). By I interfered, almost akin to a PETA member interfering with a lion's hunt, and while saving the kid, in some sense, may have upset the balance. Again, I don't think this situation escalated anywhere and the kid is unlikely to face further repercussions because of my actions, but the possibilty is there and it makes me wonder... I still stand by my intervention at the moment, but it raises an interesting question that I would like some commentary on...

Second. It was after lunch. The kids all eat lunch in their homerooms (which I guess is like the cohort system; they all have classes together with their homeroom, and usually the teachers go to the homeroom, unless other facilities (i.e. science, gym) are needed) and are supervised by the homeroom teacher. Lunch is wheeled in on a cart with the food, trays and particular plates bowls, etc, that are needed. Some students are in charge of distribution, and after they eat, everything is put back on the cart and wheeled out and the school day goes on. Ok, so after lunch, I go with my teachers (this class actually had both the other English teachers and me) and we start the class, when a left-over tray is discovered on a desk of a kid who is late coming back from recess. There is some immediate tension, as this is something that obviously shouldn't happen and in fact has never happened before, in my experience. Finally, the kid comes back and the teacher begins to question him, and he immediately denies that it is his, is believed, and the question posed to the class as to whose tray it really is. There are snickers and silence, the question is posed again, and yet no perpetrator comes forth. After some stern words, the head teacher suddenly says that the class is over for the day and storms out of there followed by the other teacher (as I found later, he said that until the perpetrator came forth, there would be no class). I stand there a bit stunned, encountering such a breach of protocol for the first time. Remember, I have never seen a misbehaving kid sent out in the hall (much less to the principal's office) and here is a full-out cancellation of class. So, I stand there for a little while longer, and finally cannot resist the temptation to actually have the whole class to myself, to teach as I see fit. So, I continue the lesson. We had just started the daily dictation, which I take over and cater it to the theme of the lunch tray, saying stuff like "It's not my tray, is it yours?" etc., trying to use the incident to teach or re-inforce some stuff. We get through that, do some true and false, I'm getting the kids to talk, they're actually listening to me, and we're actually doing some learning. As I am totally unprepared for a lesson (usually, I'm just told what to do by the teachers), I decided to play some English games and organize the class, and just as we're about to get started the not-main English teacher comes back (meanwhile a good twenty minutes has elapsed) and inquires as to what I am doing. I step out into the hall and she kindly asks that I cease and desist and return to the teachers' room. Wanting to avoid an argument, I apologize, go back to the class, explain that I must return because of the tray, pop out my one Japanese joke (which they love, but it itself it isn't all that great; the jist of it is the English word sorry is pronounced like the Japanese word for prime minister, so I basically said, "I'm sorry, I'm sorry, Koizumi sorry." That's it, but it was effective). After this, I return to the teacher's room, where the head teacher thanks me for trying to teach, meanwhile I can read his face to really be saying that he highly disproves of what he did.

And so, again, I have to question whether what I did was right. In Japanese teaching eyes, there was a serious infraction of social code and the tray was left out of place, and the school process could not go on until it was resolved. The resolution was obviously that the owner of the tray would step forth, return the tray to its proper location, and face whatever consequences there were, and class would move on. Because this did not happen, the head teacher did what he did, imposed his authority, and left, expecting me and the other to follow. She did, I didn't. I continued to teach the class, because I personally did not feel that the tray incident was a huge deal and that the pressures on the perpetrator of remaining anonymous were too great for anything beneficial to happen. But, of course, in a way, I was defying the authority of the head teacher and his decision. I did what I thought was right when he was trying to make a different point, and such a defiance, especially right in front of the students could potentially damage his reputation with them and his ability to teach them (while potentially increasing mine). But, at the same time, was I to defy my own instict and premonition as well, simply because the Japanese teacher had done it??? Therein is the other little dilemma of the day.

Of course this may all seem trivial, and it kind of is, but like I said, I would just like to hear about other people's opinions and what they think, that's all. In the meanwhile, I did a little radio show last Saturday, where I got to talk a bit about myself in Japanese (wow, was that horrible or what), and to play some of the music that I like (you should of seen the faces of the hosts of the show...ahahahhaa). The songs chosen were 1) Cold and Ugly; 2) Mann geggen Mann (Rammstein); 3) Passive (APC); 4) The Bitter End (Placebo); 5) Gotta Get Away (Offspring); and 6) 46 and 2...some of us may remember the opening lyrics of Cold and Ugly ("Throw that Bob Marley wannabe.......). Yeah, I can't say they loved it, but it will air this week.....oh, the ways that I amuse myself. A picture of it follows this post. Then, Saturday evening I played my first game of poker and amazingly, only lost my initial buy-in. It was fun and I made some crucial mistakes from which to learn, not the least of which is, don't attempt to actually win at cards and become inebriated, excessively, at the same time. Another week is on, and hopefuly you're all doing well. Please comment on the dilemmas above. Laterz.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

The fight
This reminds of "Back to the future". I think your act has disrupted the "space time continuum". You have disrupted the delacate balance of a school society. I must admit I would have done the same. The difference being, I would have strayed from "official investigation" or involving authority or repremand. That is a much greater system shock then simply stopping the fight.

The beaten up kid will survive and remember your gratuitous favor. While the bully has lost some face and furor that he had displayed and may later think twice about beating someone up.

The consequences of an official investigation however, have disrupted the "space time continuum". Observe the consequences.

The Tray
Balsy, is all I have to say. You have successfully gained favor from the kids and simultaneously became the "most wanted" gorilla on the teacher's list in that school.

I would have probably tried to resolve the situation or not done anything at all. Authority and respect is precarious - one second you have both, the next you have none. If you are in the person's situation (in terms of authority) I am sure that you would not have appreciated someone undermining your authority.

Radio
Nice list. Looks like you have another career path. Mankow meets Rush meets Michael Moore.

The lesson
I look at it this way:
When in Rome...

The caveat:
As long as you are not breaching your own ethical or moral code.

Anonymous said...

I think that you did the right thing in the first situation because a line has to be drawn somewhere. The Japanese might find these types of altercations as part of their culture, but I'm sure they wouldn't want someone being hurt seriously and that potential was there. If there is a mob of kids surrounding and goading the attacker into repeatedly kicking this poor kid, the kids may not know when to stop. And what are you supposed to do? Look in and let it continue until the point where the kid might get hurt seriously? You're not a referee. I'm sure the parents of the child who got beat up (Japanese, American, Algerian, whatever) would appreciate the fact that you stepped in and whatever consequences ensue were meant to ensue because you stepped in.

As far as the second situation, I think you may have overstepped your authority a little. Just as you wrote in the previous situation, the elder kids (in this case adults) demand a certain level of respect from the younger ones, you as the assistant needed to show respect to the main English teacher. If he thought it was a big deal, it's not your right to impose your will on the classroom dynamics which are in contradiction to the head teacher. You were right in saying that the kids may have lost a certain amount of respect and the main teacher may have had a certain level of his authority tarnished, by you taking this situation lightly and basically defying his authority by teaching a class he did not want to teach. In a society based on the tenets of respect, you may have committed a flaw.

But those are just the thoughts of

rdm said...

Right on, brothers, thank you for these comments, for they help me shed further light on the situation; now, usually, when a man (or woman) commits a certain act and then begins to question his (or her) validity in having acted that way, inevitably he (or she) begins to justify himself (or herself) (Why are you on about woman Stan? I want to be one. From now on, I want you all to call me Loretta. What?) for if we didn't live this way, we wouldn't get very far out of our mouse holes; if we didn't think and believe and know that the actions we were comitting were the right ones, what actions would we commit? Having said that, however, here is a situation where I can give some distance to the committed act and begin to analyze exactly what happened and what motivated it and be able to tell that in the first instance it was an impulse to stop an injustice that compelled me and in the second instance it was a selfish desire to pursue my own course (masked of course as an impulse to stop an injustice, in this case, that of depriving the kids of a much-needed and desired English lesson). So, I thank you, commentators, for the lights you have shed and for the help you have provided in this little exercise in self-analysis...

Anonymous said...

in terms of the fight, i think you were absolutely right to do what you did. how can you look at someone getting a beating and just stand by without acting? i'm sure none of us were the most popular kid in the class and have had plenty of experiences where it would have been nice to have someone of authority (and immense size, in your case) on our side. not to interfere is not an option, even if it defies japanese social convention. in my opinion, you should have acted sooner before they moved their little pummeling session into the classroom.

in terms of the tray, i'm glad that you took the opportunity to introduce the kids to the tactics of the american educational system: be their friend first, their teacher second and if they learn something then ok and if not, then alright. yeah, you might have stepped on the boundaries, but you had your time to shine and you'll always remember it, so props to you for taking that chance.

no dilemmas, you just need reassurace, i think. peace.

rdm said...

ms. miller, you're probably right about the re-assurance, but overall, it was just something to mentally toy around with, peace to you too.

rdm said...

Mr. Morgan, wow, your deal sounds hot man, a PhD in two weeks? Almost too good to be true...
Anyone know how these things get into blogs???

Anonymous said...

Increase the size of your...401k in just 2 weeks.

Tired of looking and feeling limp because of your short...term mutual fund holdings? Sign up with the Ginza Express to feel like a man.

100% verifiable. This is a real deal!!!

Anonymous said...

Dear Miss Loretta,
I have to agree with Ms. Elina in that reassurance is what you seek. What's done is done. I must admit that I much too often seek reassurance from others and find myself right back where I started. I realized that had I traversed the "space time " contiuum and experienced the same moment again but having the knowledge that I have now I indubitably would have made the same split second decision.

If a particular decision takes some thought however, I seek reassurance before I make that decision. In this instance, I am almost certain to make the wrong decision no matter what the decision is. Such is my nature. These are the decisions that I regret later. Catch my drift?

Anonymous said...

your behavior mirrors that of some familiar iconoclastic hollywood charaters. perhaps you were trying to embody your childhood heroes...

the fight situation is pretty obvious... very similar to that scene in T2 when john and "uncle bob" are hanging out by the pay phone... about 20 mins into the movie.

the tray scenario required about 2 minutes of research, but i came up with kirstie alley in "for richer or poorer" when she shows the amish ladies how to make pretty-colored clothing.

slavik, if you mention "space time continuum" again, i will kick you in the balls next time i see you.

Anonymous said...

в чужой монастырь со своим уставом не лезь. And that's all i have to say 'bout that

Anonymous said...

Kolobed,
You have disturbed the "space time continuum", you must feel the wreath of Darth.

Anonymous said...

The fight
In addition to everything that has been posted: If the kids saw you notice the fight and walk away, that would be equivalent to you saying that this behavior is appropriapriate. While it is sometimes an acceptable part of growing up, it is not appropriate and you can't send the kids this message.

-marina


The tray
If you treat something lightly or reprimend with a smile, the kids wil not take it seriously and next week there will be two trays left over. Happened to me and boys 'forgetting' to wear kippas in my class. Not like i personally care, but it's a rule.

If you want to teach a class by yourself, why don't you just ask?